Jesus Bano-Rodriguez

Jesus Bano-Rodriguez

PhD, MD, Board Certification, Expert degree in Epidemiology & Clinical Research

Infectious Disease Specialist

35+ years of Experience

Male📍 Sydney

About of Jesus Bano-Rodriguez

Jesus Bano-Rodriguez is an Infectious Disease Specialist based in Bedford Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

His work is all about serious infections, the ones that can move fast and need careful, step-by-step care. Over time, he has looked after people with a wide range of conditions, including sepsis, pneumonia, and hospital-acquired infections like MRSA. He also helps manage infections that can show up with urinary problems, such as UTIs, and harder infections like endocarditis.

In many cases, he focuses on getting the cause right, especially when symptoms overlap or a patient has other health issues. This can include people living with chronic kidney disease, those after kidney or pancreas transplant, and patients who are more at risk of infections. He also looks after complex respiratory illness, including COVID-19 and outbreaks like H1N1 influenza. At times, this includes complications such as ARDS, and infections tied to long-lasting effects like long haul COVID.

With 35+ years of experience, he’s seen how infections can change from day to day. That experience matters for decisions about treatment, monitoring, and when a patient needs more urgent support. He also has a strong epidemiology and clinical research background, which helps when planning how to prevent infections and manage them safely.

Education-wise, he holds an MD from the University of Seville in Spain (1989), and he completed specialist internal medicine board certification in Spain (1994). He later earned a PhD in Medicine from the University of Seville (1997). He also gained an expert degree in Epidemiology & Clinical Research at the University of Granada (2000).

Research is part of his day-to-day approach. He stays involved in clinical research, and he has been connected with clinical trials. That background supports how he thinks about evidence-based care, especially for tough infections where the details really matter.

Education

  • MD (Doctor of Medicine); University of Seville, Spain; 1989
  • Board Certification, Specialist in Internal Medicine; Spain (medical board); 1994
  • PhD in Medicine; University of Seville; 1997
  • Expert degree in Epidemiology & Clinical Research; University of Granada, Spain; 2000

Services & Conditions Treated

SepsisMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)Pseudomonas Stutzeri InfectionsUrinary Tract Infection (UTI)COVID-19EndocarditisH1N1 InfluenzaHospital-Acquired PneumoniaPneumoniaSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)Spontaneous Bacterial PeritonitisAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)AgranulocytosisAlternating Hemiplegia of ChildhoodChronic Kidney DiseaseCytomegalovirus InfectionDiverticular DiseaseFluHemiplegiaHip ReplacementInfantile NeutropeniaInfectious ArthritisInfective EndocarditisKidney TransplantLong Haul COVIDNeonatal SepsisObstructive UropathyPancreas TransplantPseudomembranous ColitisRelapsing FeverSeptic Arthritis

Publications

5 total
Quasi-species prevalence and clinical impact of evolving SARS-CoV-2 lineages in European COVID-19 cohorts, January 2020 to February 2022.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin • March 14, 2025

Matilda Berkell, Anna Górska, Mathias Smet, Delphine Bachelet, Elisa Gentilotti, Mariana Guedes, Anna Franco Yusti, Fulvia Mazzaferri, Erley Forero, Veerle Matheeussen, Benoit Visseaux, Zaira Palacios Baena, Natascia Caroccia, Aline-marie Florence, Charlotte Charpentier, Coretta Van Leer, Maddalena Giannella, Alex Friedrich, Jesús Rodríguez Baño, Jade Ghosn, Cedric Laouénan, Evelina Tacconelli, Surbhi Malhotra Kumar

BackgroundEvolution of SARS-CoV-2 is continuous.AimBetween 01/2020 and 02/2022, we studied SARS-CoV-2 variant epidemiology, evolution and association with COVID-19 severity.MethodsIn nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID-19 patients (n = 1,762) from France, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands, SARS-CoV-2 was investigated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and whole-genome sequencing, and the virus variant/lineage (NextStrain/Pangolin) was determined. Patients' demographic and clinical details were recorded. Associations between mild/moderate or severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 variants and patient characteristics were assessed by logistic regression. Rates and genomic locations of mutations, as well as quasi-species distribution (≥ 2 heterogeneous positions, ≥ 50× coverage) were estimated based on 1,332 high-quality sequences.ResultsOverall, 11 SARS-CoV-2 clades infected 1,762 study patients of median age 59 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45-73), with 52.5% (n = 925) being male. In total, 101 non-synonymous substitutions/insertions correlated with disease prognosis (severe, n = 27; mild-to-moderate, n = 74). Several hotspots (mutation rates ≥ 85%) occurred in Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants of concern (VOCs) but none in pre-Alpha strains. Four hotspots were retained across all study variants, including spike:D614G. Average number of mutations per open-reading-frame (ORF) increased in the spike gene (average < 5 per genome in January 2020 to > 15 in 2022), but remained stable in ORF1ab, membrane, and nucleocapsid genes. Quasi-species were most prevalent in 20A/EU2 (48.9%), 20E/EU1 (48.6%), 20A (38.8%), and 21K/Omicron (36.1%) infections. Immunocompromised status and age (≥ 60 years), while associated with severe COVID-19 or death irrespective of variant (odds ratio (OR): 1.60-2.25; p ≤ 0.014), did not affect quasi-species' prevalence (p > 0.05).ConclusionSpecific mutations correlate with COVID-19 severity. Quasi-species potentially shaping VOCs' emergence are relevant to consider.

External validation of the predictive ability of Charson, SOFA, Pitt, INCREMENT-ESBL and bloodstream infection mortality Risk for 30-day-mortality in bacteraemia using the PROBAC cohort data.

Infectious Diseases (London, England) • July 09, 2025

Sandra De La Rosa Riestra, Belén Gutiérrez, Inmaculada López Hernández, María Pérez Rodríguez, Josune Goikoetxea Agirre, Antonio Plata, Eva León, María Fariñas Álvarez, Isabel Fernández Natal, Jonathan Fernández Suárez, Lucía Boix Palop, Jordi Cuquet Pedragosa, Alfredo Jover Sáenz, Juan Manuel Calvo, Andrés Martín Aspas, Clara Natera Kindelán, Alfonso Del Arco Jiménez, Pedro María Pérez Crespo, Luis López Cortés, Jesús Rodríguez Baño

The development of predictive mortality scores for bacteraemia is fundamental for identifying patients in whom increasing our management efforts. However, it is necessary to assess the validity of the results obtained when they are applied to new cohorts. We evaluated the ability of different scales (Charlson, also age-adjusted Charlson and updated Charlson, SOFA, Pitt, INCREMENT-ESBL and BSIMRS) to predict 30-day mortality in bacteraemia through the AUROC and calibration plots. The scales were applied to specific patient from PROBAC cohort (prospective, multicentre with bacteraemia of any aetiology) according to the population in which the scale was originally developed. We also applied the recently developed PROBAC score (this time applied to the entire PROBAC cohort, rather than only to patients who did not die within 48 h of blood culture collection as in the original development of the scale). After applying Charlson, age-adjusted Charlson, updated Charlson, SOFA, Pitt and PROBAC to the entire PROBAC cohort, we obtained AUROC values: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.58-0.62); 0.62 (95% CI: 0.60-0.64); 0.60 (95% CI: 0.58-0.62); 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66-0.71); 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.82) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.81), respectively. INCREMENT-ESBL was applied only to gram negative bacteraemia yielding 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.82) and BSIMRS to gram negative bacteraemia who received adequate empirical antibiotic yielding 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75). Scores that have been developed in bacteraemia cohorts and have been used for the prediction of short-term mortality were found to be better at predicting mortality in our analysis.

Development and validation of a predictive mortality scoring model for bloodstream infections due to Escherichia coli in the PROBAC cohort.

Infection • April 23, 2025

Paula Olivares Navarro, María Pérez Rodríguez, Ane Goikoetxea Agirre, José Reguera Iglesias, Eva León, María Mantecón, Ángeles Pulido Navazo, Lucía Boix Palop, Pilar Retamar Gentil, Carlos Armiñanzas Castillo, Isabel Fernández Natal, Alfredo Jover Sáenz, Alfonso Del Arco Jiménez, Jonathan Fernández Suárez, Andrés Martín Aspas, Alejandro Smithson Amat, Alberto Bahamonde Carrasco, Clara Natera Kindelán, Pedro Martínez Pérez Crespo, Inmaculada López Hernández, Luis López Cortés, Jesús Rodríguez Baño

Background: Escherichia coli is the most frequent cause of bacteraemia and has a major impact on morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to define and internally validate a predictive risk score of 30-day all-cause mortality. Methods: A prospective, multicentre, cohort study conducted in 26 Spanish hospitals between October 2016 and March 2017 was performed. All monomicrobial E. coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) were included. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Cases were randomized to a derivation cohort (DC) and a validation cohort (VC). The predictive score was calculated from a multivariable model performed by logistic regression in the DC and subsequently applied to the VC. The predictive ability of the model was estimated by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and the goodness of fit by Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plot. Results: Overall, 1435 cases were included in the DC and 715 in the VC. The final multivariable model for mortality in DC included (adjusted OR; 95% CI) age over 55 years (2.10; 1.01-4.36), dementia (2.08; 1.24-3.50), liver disease (1.81; 0.99-3.28), healthcare-associated acquisition (2.29; 1.52-3.44), Pitt index > 3 (3.59; 2.30-5.61), SOFA ≥ 2 (1.66; 1.04-2.64), and urinary tract source (0.37; 0.24-0.56). The predictive score showed an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.83) in the DC and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84) in the VC. Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a predictive scoring model to identify patients with E. coli bacteraemia at high and low risk of crude mortality on day 30 of BSI.

Effectiveness of oral step-down therapy and early oral switch for bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacterales: A post hoc emulation trial of the SIMPLIFY trial.

International Journal Of Infectious Diseases : IJID : Official Publication Of The International Society For Infectious Diseases • March 21, 2025

Emanuele Rando, Mercedes Delgado Valverde, Josune Aguirre, Laura Carrión, María José Vidal, José Luis Andrés, María Teresa Rodríguez, Lucía Lamas, Francisco Arnaiz De Las Revillas, Carlos Armiñanzas, Carlos De Alegría Puig, Patricia Aguilar, María Del Martínez Rubio, Carmen Sáez Béjar, Carmen De Las Cuevas, Andrés Martín Aspas, Fátima Galán, José Yuste, José Leiva León, Germán Bou, Patricia González, Lucía Boix Palop, Mariona Xercavins Valls, Miguel Goenaga Sánchez, Diego Anza, Juan Castón, Manuel Rufián, Esperanza Merino, Juan Rodríguez, Belén Loeches, Clara Rosso Fernández, José Bravo Ferrer, Pilar Retamar Gentil, Jesús Rodríguez Baño, Luis Eduardo Cortés

Objective: We investigated the effectiveness of early oral switch for treating Enterobacterales bloodstream infection (BSI) by performing a post hoc emulation trial of the SIMPLIFY trial. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. We specified the target trial characteristics selecting patients who achieved clinical stability on day 5. We categorized patients into those who switched on day 5 and those who continued intravenously. The primary outcome was clinical cure at the test of cure. We set a propensity score for being switched on day 5 to reduce confounding. We ran simple, not-propensity-adjusted, and propensity-adjusted logistic regression models to ascertain the association of switch on day 5 with clinical cure. Results: Among 303 patients who achieved clinical stability on day 5, 110 (36.3%) were switched orally on day 5, and 193 (63.7%) were kept intravenously. We detected no difference in clinical cure between those switched on day 5 and those continued intravenously (risk ratios 1.04, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.98-1.10). Propensity-adjusted analysis did not show an association between day 5 switch and clinical cure (OR 2.10, 95% CI 0.96-7.41). Conclusions: Oral step-down therapy on day 5 was not associated with worse clinical cure for Enterobacterales BSI.

Adequacy and implications of antimicrobial prophylaxis for elective surgeries in a tertiary hospital: a cross sectional and retrospective cohort study (ADEQUAP).

Antimicrobial Resistance And Infection Control • March 10, 2025

Marco Piscaglia, Dolores Martín Sierra, Antonio Huelva Millán, Maria Garcia Poo, Jesús Rodríguez Baño, Maria Del Toro López

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is essential for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) but is often improperly administered. This study assessed SAP adequacy and its association with SSI and other nosocomial infections (NI) to identify areas for improvement. Methods: This cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study included adults undergoing elective cardiovascular, orthopaedic, colorectal surgeries and cystectomy in 2022 at a teaching hospital. SAP was considered adequate if it met all local guideline criteria: indication, drug, dose, timing of administration, redosing and duration. Associations between SAP adequacy and SSI were analyzed using generalized mixed models. Results: Among 723 patients included (median age 68 years; 57.7% male), 714 (98.8%) received SAP. Overall multidomain adherence to SAP guidelines was 34.6%, with high compliance for regimen (92.8%), dose (97.5%), and timing (98.3%), but lower compliance for redosing (63.4%) and duration (53.9%). Regimen adequacy was significantly lower in patients with beta-lactam allergies (55.6% vs. 94.8%, p < 0.001) and in cystectomy cases compared to other procedures (41.2% vs. 94.1%, p < 0.001). Non-compliant regimens were independently associated with a higher SSI rate (adjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI: 1.8-8.3; p = 0.003), but not with non-SSI NIs. Inadequate SAP was also associated with a length of stay (LOS) exceeding 10 days (RR 4.61; p < 0.001) and higher 90-day mortality (RR 3.37; p = 0.007). Patients who developed an SSI were significantly more likely to develop additional non-SSI NIs (adjusted OR 6.1; 95% CI: 2.8-13.4; p < 0.001). Median LOS was longer in patients with SSI (16.5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), and SSI was also associated with increased 90-day mortality (14.7% vs. 2.7%; RR 5.42; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Non-adherence to SAP guidelines was associated with an increased risk of SSI, prolonged LOS, and greater crude mortality. Key areas for improvement include regimen selection, appropriate redosing, and limiting SAP duration. Patients with beta-lactam allergies were specially at risk of receiving inadequate SAP. Although SAP non-compliance was not independently associated with other NIs, SSIs significantly increased their occurrence.

Clinical Trials

2 total

Early Oral Switch Therapy in Low-risk Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

CompletedPhase 3

Increasing resistance to antibiotic agents has been recognized as a major health problem worldwide that will even aggravate due to the lack of new antimicrobial agents within the next decade \[1\]. This threat underscores the need to maximize clinical utility of existing antibiotics, through more rational prescription, e.g. optimizing duration of treatment. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common disease with about 200,000 cases occurring annually in Europe \[2\]. A course of at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials is considered standard therapy \[3-5\] in uncomplicated SAB. This relatively long course serves to prevent SAB-related complications (such as endocarditis and vertebral osteomyelitis) that may result from hematogenous dissemination to distant sites. However, there is insufficient evidence that a full course of intravenous antibiotic therapy is always required in patients with a low risk of SAB-related complications. In a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial we aim to demonstrate that an early switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy is non-inferior to a conventional 14-days course of intravenous therapy regarding efficacy and safety. An early switch from intravenous to oral therapy would provide several benefits such as earlier discharge, fewer adverse reactions associated with intravenous therapy, increased quality of life, and cost savings.

Participants: 215

Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Monotherapy for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients

CompletedPhase 3

To demonstrate that the combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin is superior to daptomycin alone in the treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia.

Participants: 167

Frequently Asked Questions

What services do you offer as an infectious disease specialist?
I provide care for infections like MRSA, UTIs, pneumonia, sepsis and hospital infections, as well as complex issues such as endocarditis, kidney and transplant related infections, viral illnesses like COVID-19 and influenza, and conditions like long‑haul COVID.
Which conditions do you commonly treat?
I treat a wide range of infections and related conditions, including pneumonia, septic arthritis, endocarditis, neonatal and infant infections, kidney transplant infections, and severe infections such as sepsis and SARS.
How do I arrange an appointment with you in Sydney?
Contact the practice in Sydney to book an appointment. You may be asked about your medical history and any current infections to help prepare for your visit.
Do you treat long‑term or complex infections?
Yes. I have many years of experience with complex infections and conditions that require ongoing management, such as hospital‑acquired infections, chronic kidney issues related to infection, and infections in transplant patients.
What should I bring to my first consult?
Bring any recent test results, current medications, and a summary of your symptoms and health concerns so we can plan the best course of care.
Are there virtual or follow‑up options for ongoing care?
Follow‑ups and some consultations may be available by phone or video, depending on your condition and the practice’s arrangements. We’ll discuss the best option for you at your next visit.

Contact Information

Bedford Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Is this your profile?

Claim this profile →

Memberships

  • Scientific Advisory Committees, European research programmes (e.g. Joint Programme Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance, etc.)
  • European Study Groups (e.g. for bloodstream infection, sepsis, and endocarditis)