Jenny M. Ziviani

Jenny M. Ziviani

PhD, BAppSc (OT), MEd, BSc (OT)

Pediatrician

Over 30 years Experience as clinician, professor, and researcher

FemalešŸ“ South Brisbane

About of Jenny M. Ziviani

Jenny M. Ziviani is a paediatrician based in South Brisbane, QLD, working out of Level 6, 62 Graham Street. She looks after children and teens who have ongoing neurological and developmental needs, and she also helps families make sense of what to do day to day.


Over time, her work has focused a lot on conditions like cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, and spasticity. At times, this includes kids with patterns such as alternating hemiplegia of childhood and spastic diplegia (infantile type). She also supports children on the autism spectrum, where the support plan needs to fit the child’s strengths, routines, and everyday life.


Jenny brings more than just clinical care. With more than 30 years of experience as a clinician, professor, and researcher, she has a practical eye for what helps in real families, not just in theory. That blend of experience can be useful when symptoms change over time, or when you need clear steps for managing growth, movement, learning, and communication.


In many cases, her appointments are about working through concerns with calm, plain language. She understands that parents and carers often feel stretched. So she tries to keep decisions grounded, with a focus on safety, comfort, and steady progress. Families may come with questions about movement, muscle tone, development, or how best to support their child at home and at school.


Jenny studied at the University of Queensland and completed a PhD, along with multiple degrees in health and education. Her qualifications include a PhD, Master of Education (MEd), and Bachelor of Applied Science in Occupational Therapy, plus a Bachelor of Science in Occupational Therapy. This training helps her think about the whole child, including how day-to-day activities can fit with medical care.


She also has a strong research background and has published work over the years. While each child’s situation is different, research can still help guide choices when it comes to understanding complex conditions and planning support over time.

Education

  • Ph.D.; University of Queensland; 1989
  • Master of Education (MEd)
  • Bachelor of Applied Science in Occupational Therapy (BAppSc OT)
  • Bachelor of Science in Occupational Therapy (BSc OT)

Services & Conditions Treated

Alternating Hemiplegia of ChildhoodCerebral PalsyHemiplegiaSpastic Diplegia Infantile TypeAutism Spectrum DisorderSpasticity

Publications

5 total
Randomized Comparison Trial of Rehabilitation Very Early for Infants with Congenital Hemiplegia.

The Journal of pediatrics • July 01, 2024

Roslyn Boyd, Susan Greaves, Jenny Ziviani, Iona Novak, Nadia Badawi, Kerstin Pannek, Catherine Elliott, Margaret Wallen, Catherine Morgan, Jane Valentine, Lisa Findlay, Andrea Guzzetta, Koa Whittingham, Robert Ware, Simona Fiori, Nathalie Maitre, Jill Heathcock, Kimberley Scott, Ann-christin Eliasson, Leanne Sakzewski

Objective: To compare efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy (Baby-CIMT) with bimanual therapy (Baby-BIM) in infants at high risk of unilateral cerebral palsy. Methods: This was a single-blind, randomized-comparison-trial that had the following inclusion criteria: (1) asymmetric brain lesion (2) absent fidgety General Movements, (3) Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination below cerebral palsy cut-points, (4) entry at 3-9 months of corrected age, and (5) >3-point difference between hands on Hand Assessment Infants (HAI). Infants were randomized to Baby-CIMT or Baby-BIM, which comprised 6-9 months of home-based intervention. Daily dose varied from 20 to 40 minutes according to age (total 70-89.2 hours). Primary outcome measure was the HAI after intervention, with secondary outcomes Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment and Bayley III cognition at 24 months of corrected age. Results: In total, 96 infants (51 male, 52 right hemiplegia) born median at 37-weeks of gestation were randomized to Baby-CIMT (n = 46) or Baby-BIM (n = 50) and commenced intervention at a mean 6.5 (SD 1.6) months corrected age. There were no between group differences immediately after intervention on HAI (mean difference [MD] 0.98 HAI units, 95% CI 0.94-2.91; P = .31). Both groups demonstrated significant clinically important improvements from baseline to after intervention (Baby-BIM MD 3.48, 95% CI 2.09-4.87; Baby-CIMT MD 4.42, 95% CI 3.07-5.77). At 24 months, 64 infants were diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (35 Baby-CIMT, 29 Baby-BIM). Infants who entered the study between 3 and 6 months of corrected age had greater change in HAI Both Hands Sum Score compared with those who entered at ≄6 months of corrected age (MD 7.17, 95% CI 2.93-11.41, P = .001). Conclusions: Baby-CIMT was not superior to Baby-BIM, and both interventions improved hand development. Infants commencing intervention at <6 months corrected age had greater improvements in hand function.

Mother's experiences of shame and compassion in the early postnatal period: A thematic analysis.

Midwifery • September 17, 2024

Julia Marsden, Koa Whittingham, Jenny Ziviani, Sophie O'brien, Rebecca Redmond, Julie Jomeen, Pamela Meredith

Background: Mothers are less likely to seek support from maternity care providers who appear critical or judgmental. While compassion from providers can help mitigate the impact of shame, the experiences of shame within a mothers' close support network remains unexplored. Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore mothers' experiences of shame and compassion within their support networks in the early postpartum period. Methods: Fourteen mothers were recruited when their babies were approximately 3-months old from a larger Australian study on shame and compassion. A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Results: Six themes were identified by the authors: (1) unravelling judgment; (2) are you with me or against me?; (3) the voice of doubt: am I failing at this?; (4) when mothering ideals don't work out: managing shame in your village; (5) finding the right kind of support; and (6) weaving kindness into your role as a mother. All mothers, regardless of who shamed them turned towards others who were sensitive, sympathetic, and empathic, to cope with the shame experience. Conclusions: Shame experiences can significantly influence mothers' willingness to access support, impacting their mental health. Maternity care providers can play a critical role in recognising and addressing these dynamics to foster a more supportive environment. Conclusions: Understanding the complexities of shame and compassion can guide providers in creating compassionate care strategies that better serve mothers during this vulnerable period.

Participate CP 2: optimising participation in physically active leisure for children with cerebral palsy - protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial.

BMJ Open • October 03, 2023

Leanne Sakzewski, Sarah Reedman, Catherine Elliott, Jenny Ziviani, Iona Novak, Stewart Trost, Annette Majnemer, Tracy Comans, Keiko Shikako, Robert Ware, Lynda Mcnamara, Sian Williams, Syed Keramat, Denise Brookes, Roslyn Boyd

Introduction: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) participate less in physical activities and have increased sedentary behaviour compared with typically developing peers. Participate CP is a participation-focused therapy intervention for children with CP with demonstrated efficacy in a phase II randomised controlled trial (RCT) to increase perceived performance of physical activity participation goals. This study will test the effectiveness of Participate CP in a multisite phase III RCT. Methods and analysis: One hundred children with CP, aged 8-14 years, classified Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-IV will be randomised to either (1) receive Participate CP once/week for 1 hour for 12 weeks, or (2) waitlist control, usual care group. The waitlist group will then receive Participate CP following the 26-week retention time point. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 12 weeks and then 26 weeks post baseline. The primary outcomes are (1) self-reported participation goal performance on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at 12 weeks and (2) daily time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Secondary outcomes include home and community participation frequency, involvement and environmental supportiveness, contextual barriers to participation, quality of life, intrinsic motivation for physical activities, child perception of an autonomy-supportive climate for physical activities and physical literacy at 12 and 26 weeks post study entry. Ethics and dissemination: The Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, The University of Queensland and the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees have approved this study. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. Trial registration number: ACTRN12618000206224.

Realist process evaluation of occupational performance coaching: protocol.

BMJ Open • June 06, 2024

Fiona Graham, Jonathan Williman, Laura Desha, Deborah Snell, Bernadette Jones, Tristram Ingham, Anna Tiatia Latu, Annemarei Ranta, Emma Walker, Salote Makasini, Jenny Ziviani

Introduction: A cluster randomised controlled trial, the Meaning, Agency and Nurturing Autonomy (MANA) study, is underway comparing the effects of occupational performance coaching (OPC) and usual care on the social participation, health and well-being of children with neurodisability and their caregivers. This protocol presents the realist process evaluation which is occurring in parallel with the trial to allow testing and further refinement of OPC programme theory, as represented in its logic model. The aim of this realist evaluation is to examine what works, for whom, in the implementation of OPC with caregivers of children with neurodisability (in particular, Māori and Pasifika) in current service delivery contexts. Methods and analysis: Guided by OPC programme theory and realist evaluation processes, mixed-methods data collected from the MANA study OPC group will be analysed to elucidate when OPC works (outcomes), for whom, how (mechanisms) and under what circumstances (contexts). This will culminate in the synthesis of Intervention-Actor Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations. Descriptive analyses will be reported for quantitative measures of treatment fidelity (OPC-Fidelity Measure), caregiver emotional response to OPC (Session Rating Scale) preintervention emotional state (Depression Stress and Anxiety Scale) and client outcomes (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). Reflexive thematic analysis will be undertaken to analyse realist interviews with therapists who implemented OPC above and below fidelity thresholds and culturally focused interviews with clients of Māori or Pasifika ethnicity, informing understanding of the contexts influencing therapists' implementation of OPC with fidelity, and the mechanisms triggered within therapists or caregivers to elicit a response to the intervention. The MANA study trial outcomes will be reported separately. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for this study was granted by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (20/STH/93). In all participating jurisdictions local area approval was obtained, involving a process of local Māori consultation. Results will be disseminated to all participants, and more broadly to clinicians and policy-makers through conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications, which will inform decision-making about resourcing and supporting effective delivery of OPC to optimise outcomes for children and caregivers. Trial registration number: ACTRN12621000519853.

Fidelity of Delivery in a Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial of Intervention Efficacy for Infants With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.

Pediatric Physical Therapy : The Official Publication Of The Section On Pediatrics Of The American Physical Therapy Association • September 25, 2023

Kimberley Scott, Leanne Sakzewski, Jenny Ziviani, Jill Heathcock, Roslyn Boyd

Purpose: To investigate the reliability of a measure of fidelity of therapist delivery, quantify fidelity of delivery, and determine factors impacting fidelity in the Rehabilitation EArly for Congenital Hemiplegia (REACH) clinical trial. Methods: Ninety-five infants (aged 3-9 months) with unilateral cerebral palsy participated in the REACH clinical trial. The Therapist Fidelity Checklist (TFC) evaluated key intervention components. Video-recorded intervention sessions were scored using the TFC. Results: Inter- and intrarater reliability was percentage agreement 77% to 100%. Fidelity of delivery was high for 88.9% of sessions and moderate for 11.1% of sessions. Sessions with moderate scores included infants receiving infant-friendly bimanual therapy and occurred at the intervention midpoint or later. No significant relationships were found for TFC scores and infant age, manual ability, or parent engagement. Conclusions: Fidelity of delivery was high for the REACH trial in most intervention sessions. Standardized therapist training with intervention manuals and monthly peer-to-peer support likely contributed to these results.

Frequently Asked Questions

What services does Dr Jenny M. Ziviani offer?
Dr Jenny M. Ziviani focuses on pediatric neurology and rehabilitation. Her services include care for conditions such as Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood, Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegia, Spastic Diplegia Infantile Type, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Spasticity.
Which conditions might Dr Ziviani help my child with?
She helps children with movement and neurological needs, including cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, spasticity and autism spectrum concerns. If you’re unsure, you can ask during your appointment whether her team can help with your child’s specific situation.
Where is Dr Ziviani based?
She practices at Level 6, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
What is Dr Ziviani’s background?
Dr Ziviani has more than 30 years of experience as a clinician, professor, and researcher. She holds a PhD and degrees in Occupational Therapy and Education.
How can I book an appointment with Dr Ziviani?
Appointments can be arranged by contacting the clinic at the provided South Brisbane address. If you have questions about availability, ask when you reach out.
What should I expect at a visit with Dr Ziviani?
Visits typically involve assessing your child’s movement, function and needs, discussing goals, and planning therapy or management strategies suited to your child’s condition.

Contact Information

Level 6, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia

Is this your profile?

Claim this profile →