Peter A. Wark

Peter A. Wark

PhD, BMed, FRACP, FThorSoc, Postdoc Fellowship, Master of Medicine (Clinical Trials)

Pulmonologist

Overall 34 years of experience (26 years of specialist-level experience)

Male📍 Newcastle

About of Peter A. Wark

Peter A. Wark is a pulmonologist based in New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW 2305. He looks after people with ongoing lung conditions, as well as those who need help after a serious chest infection.


With 34 years of experience overall, including 26 years at specialist level, Peter brings a steady, practical approach. Over time, he’s helped patients deal with breathing problems that don’t always fit neatly into one label, and that can change as life goes on.


A lot of his work focuses on long-term respiratory care. This can include asthma and harder-to-control forms of asthma, chronic cough, and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). He also sees people with conditions like bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis, where the lungs are more prone to mucus build-up and repeat flare-ups.


At times, patients need support for lung inflammation linked to higher eosinophils, such as eosinophilic asthma and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. He also treats people with other complex causes of breathlessness and abnormal lung symptoms, including interstitial lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis. For some, the goal is to calm symptoms and improve day-to-day breathing; for others, it’s about getting the right plan in place early.


Peter also manages chest infections, including pneumonia, and viral illnesses that affect the lungs, such as COVID-19, H1N1 influenza, and SARS. He’s familiar with patients who have repeated episodes or slow recovery, where careful follow-up matters.


His background includes PhD study, plus ongoing specialist training and research. Education includes a Bachelor of Medicine (BMed) from the University of Newcastle, and later fellowships such as FRACP (Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians) and FThorSoc (Fellow of the Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand). He also completed a postdoctoral research fellowship with the NHMRC Neil Hamilton Fairley Travelling Fellowship, with time at the University of Southampton and University College London.


He has a Master of Medicine in Clinical Trials (University of Sydney, 2023). That research training means he understands how evidence is built and why it matters for real patients, especially when treatment options are changing.


In some cases, care can also include procedures such as endoscopy, depending on what’s needed to work out what’s going on and guide treatment. Overall, Peter’s practice is about clear answers, sensible treatment plans, and ongoing support for people living with long-term lung disease.

Education

  • Bachelor of Medicine (BMed); University of Newcastle, Australia; 1991
  • PhD (Doctor of Philosophy); University of Newcastle, Australia; 2001
  • Postdoctoral research fellowship (NHMRC Neil Hamilton Fairley Travelling Fellowship); University of Southampton and University College London; 2005
  • Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (FRACP); 1999
  • Fellow of the Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand (FThorSoc); 2017
  • Master of Medicine (Clinical Trials); University of Sydney, Australia; 2023

Services & Conditions Treated

AsthmaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)FluCystic FibrosisEosinophilic AsthmaChronic CoughChronic Eosinophilic PneumoniaEmphysemaEosinophilic PneumoniaH1N1 InfluenzaHypereosinophilic SyndromePneumoniaSimple Pulmonary EosinophiliaStridorAcute Interstitial PneumoniaAllergic Bronchopulmonary AspergillosisAlpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)AspergillosisBronchiectasisBronchitisCerebral HypoxiaCOVID-19EndoscopyExocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInterstitial Lung DiseaseLung TransplantMucormycosisNocardiosisPulmonary FibrosisPulmonary NocardiosisSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)Subcutaneous EmphysemaTonsillitis

Publications

5 total
A 20-year case-series of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome at a state-wide cystic fibrosis service.

ANZ journal of surgery • January 10, 2025

Chen Lew, Chelsea Lin, Matthew Lukies, Peter Wark, Sarah Birks, Maria Vanguardia, Satish Warrier

Background: Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) presents significant management challenges for people with cystic fibrosis (pwC). We evaluated the treatment outcomes and identified risk factors associated with the need for surgical intervention in patients admitted with DIOS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of 96 encounters of DIOS over a 20-year period, observing outcomes between cases of medical management versus those requiring for operative intervention. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian study to review intervention in DIOS. Results: Among the patients studied, 94.8% were successfully treated non-surgically. Using computed tomography (CT) confirmation of DIOS as the gold standard, only 9.1% of abdominal x-rays were accurate in finding DIOS. Gastrografin was used in half of cases and was associated with a shorter recovery time. One in 16 patients required operative management, with two cases experiencing surgery following prolonged medical treatment. A history of previous laparotomy increased the odds of requiring surgical intervention by 16 times (95% CI: 1.2-209.9, P = 0.035), while a history of meconium ileus increased the odds by 15.6 times (95% CI: 1.2-204.8, P = 0.036). All patients who underwent surgery also had pancreatic insufficiency. Conclusions: Medical management was successful in the majority of DIOS presentations. Our study emphasizes a low threshold for abdominal CT scans to identify complete DIOS in high-risk patients, particularly those with a history of laparotomy or meconium ileus, who may require surgical intervention. Furthermore, we advocate for the adjunctive use of Gastrografin alongside medical management. Future research should refine protocols for these high-risk groups to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity.

Unlocking Asthma Remission: Key Insights From an Expert Roundtable Discussion.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) • December 11, 2024

Dennis Thomas, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter Gibson, Eleanor Majellano, Vanessa Clark, Michael Fricker, Yuto Hamada, Gary Anderson, Vibeke Backer, Philip Bardin, Richard Beasley, Jimmy Chien, Claude Farah, John Harrington, Erin Harvey, Mark Hew, Anne Holland, Christine Jenkins, Constance Katelaris, Gregory Katsoulotos, Kirsty Murray, Matthew Peters, Rejoy Thomas, Katrina Tonga, John Upham, Peter Wark, Vanessa Mcdonald

Treatment targets in severe asthma have evolved towards a remission-focused paradigm guided by precision medicine. This novel concept requires a shift from evaluating the efficacy of therapies based on a single outcome at a single time point to an outcome that captures the complexity of asthma remission involving several domains assessed over a sustained period. Since the concept is still emerging, multiple definitions have been proposed, ranging from symptom control and exacerbation-free to resolution of underlying pathobiology, with varying rigour in each parameter. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current construct is needed to progress further. We conducted a roundtable discussion with 27 asthma experts to address this issue, and discussions were narratively synthesised and summarised. The participants observed that between one in three and one in five people treated with targeted biological therapies or macrolides experience low disease activity over a sustained period. They unanimously agreed that labelling the attained clinical state as clinical remission is useful as a clinical (e.g., facilitating a treat-to-target approach), policy (e.g., widening eligibility criteria for biologics), and scientific (e.g., a path to understanding cure) tool. Current remission rates vary significantly due to definition variability. When assessing remission, it is essential to consider confounding factors (e.g., steroid use for adrenal insufficiency). More research is required to reach an acceptable definition, and including the patient's voice in such research is essential. In conclusion, the concept of treatment-induced clinical remission is possible and valuable in asthma. However, further refinement of the definition is required.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is an active process in the large airways of patients with asthma-COPD overlap and partially abrogated by inhaled corticosteroid treatment: a bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy study.

Frontiers In Immunology • November 20, 2024

Surajit Dey, Wenying Lu, Prabuddha Pathinayake, Maddison Waters, Greg Haug, Josie Larby, Heinrich Weber, Peter A Wark, Mathew Eapen, Sukhwinder Sohal

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is a term used to describe a patient with coexisting clinical features of asthma and COPD. We have previously reported that epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is active in the lungs of patients with COPD however, EMT in ACO remains an unexplored area. We hypothesize that EMT is an active process in ACO. In this cross-sectional study, large airway endobronchial biopsy (EBB) tissues from patients with asthma (14), COPD (22), current (CS) and ex-smokers (ES), and ACO (12) were immunohistochemically stained for EMT markers (E and N cadherin, vimentin, S100A4, and Collagen IV) and compared with 12 current smokers with normal lung function (NLFS) and 10 non-smoking healthy control (HC) subjects. In addition, air-liquid interface (ALI) cell cultures were performed and cells from patients with ACO and HC were treated with TGF-β, IL-13 and cigarette smoke extract (CSE). Later cells from ALI cultures were lysed for Immunoblotting. Immunostained tissues were enumerated for percent expression of E and N-Cadherin in the epithelium, vimentin and S100A4 positive cells both in the epithelium and reticular basement membrane (RBM). Additionally, the degree of RBM fragmentation was evaluated, a key tissue structural marker of EMT. Compared to healthy controls and asthmatics, ACO had the greatest fragmentation of RBM (P < 0.01). ACO also had substantially decreased percentage expression of E-cadherin (P <0.01), increase percentage of N-cadherin expression, and higher vimentin and S100A4 positive basal cells, in comparison to healthy controls. In the RBM of ACO, S100A4 positive cells (P <0.05) and Vimentin-positive cells were markedly higher in comparison to HC. Similar changes were observed with western blots in response to Th-2 cytokine IL-13, CSE and EMT activator TGF-β. These data are suggestive of active EMT in ACO. Additionally, 50% of the patients with ACO were on 800 mcg/day inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment which may have abrogated some EMT activity; however, it suggests protective effects of ICS as we previously reported in COPD. Studies with larger cohorts are needed to further confirm ICS effects in ACO.

Exploring the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies by cystic fibrosis registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review.

European Respiratory Review : An Official Journal Of The European Respiratory Society • October 09, 2024

Rob Stirling, Bhumika Sood, Macken J Stirling, Tom Kotsimbos, Dominic Keating, Catherine Rang, James Trauer, Alan Young, Christiaan Yu, Julianna Bailey, Peter Wark, Angela Melder, Paul Dawkins

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) registries capture important information in high-burden health domains to support improvement in health outcomes, although a number of unanswered questions persist, as follows. 1) Do CF registries utilise implementation science strategies to improve patient outcomes? 2) Which implementation strategies have been engaged? 3) Has the engagement of these strategies been effective in improving clinical outcomes? Methods: We undertook a systematic review to exploring the use of implementation science strategies by CF registries for healthcare improvement. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare and Web of Science databases for use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementations and use of the Knowledge to Action framework for improvement. We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool for risk-of-bias assessment. Results: 1974 citations were identified and 12 studies included. Included studies described 45 ERIC implementation strategies from nine categories. Strategies included "use evaluative and iterative strategies" (n=9) and "develop stakeholder interrelationships" (n=10). Least-used strategies were "utilise financial strategies" (n=1), "support clinicians" category (n=3) and "provide interactive assistance" (n=2). All 12 studies utilised monitoring of knowledge use, and assessing barriers and facilitators of knowledge use. Only seven studies utilised mechanisms to sustain knowledge use. Conclusions: Reported studies describe significant benefits in important CF outcomes for people with CF reported at site-specific and population levels. Studies highlighted the importance of governance, leadership, patient and family engagement, multidisciplinary engagement, quality improvement, data and analytics and research. The ready availability of clinical performance data feedback to clinicians and patients by CF registries is likely to strengthen the effectiveness of CF registries in driving healthcare improvement within a learning health system.

Antibody responses against influenza A decline with successive years of annual influenza vaccination: results from an Australian Healthcare Worker cohort.

Research Square • October 07, 2024

Sheena Sullivan, Arseniy Khvorov, Louise Carolan, Leslie Dowson, Jessica Hadiprodjo, Stephany Sánchez Ovando, Yi Liu, Vivian Leung, David Hodgson, Christopher Blyth, Marion Macnish, Allen Cheng, Michelle Hagenauer, Julia Clark, Sonia Dougherty, Kristine Macartney, Archana Koirala, Ameneh Khatami, Ajay Jadhav, Helen Marshall, Kathryn Riley, Peter Wark, Catherine Delahunty, Kanta Subbarao, Adam Kucharski, Annette Fox

Influenza vaccine effectiveness and immunogenicity can be compromised with repeated vaccination. We assessed immunological markers in a cohort of healthcare workers (HCW) from six public hospitals around Australia during 2020-2021. Sera were collected pre-vaccination and ~14 and ~ 180 days post-vaccination and assessed in haemagglutination inhibition assay against egg-grown vaccine and equivalent cell-grown viruses. Responses to vaccination were compared by the number of prior vaccinations. Baseline sera were available for 595 HCW in 2020 and 1031 in 2021. 5% had not been vaccinated during five years prior to enrolment and 55% had been vaccinated every year. Post-vaccination titres for all vaccine antigens were lowest among HCW vaccinated in all 5-prior years and highest among HCW with 0 or 1 prior vaccinations, even after adjustment. This was observed for both influenza A subtypes and was dependent on pre-vaccination titre. Expanded cohorts are needed to better understand how this translates to vaccine effectiveness.

Clinical Trials

3 total

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study of Mepolizumab 100 mg SC as add-on Treatment in Participants With COPD Experiencing Frequent Exacerbations and Characterized by Eosinophil Levels (Study 208657)

CompletedPhase 3Mepolizumab

This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study designed to confirm the benefits of mepolizumab treatment on moderate or severe exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participants given as an add on to their optimized maintenance COPD therapy. The maximum duration of participant participation is approximately 109 weeks, consisting of 2 screening visits (up to 3 weeks), a run-in period (up to 2 weeks), and an intervention period of at least 52 weeks and up to 104 weeks. 800 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mepolizumab 100 milligrams (mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for at least 13 doses (52 weeks treatment period) up to a maximum of 26 doses (104 weeks treatment period). The number of randomized participants may increase up to approximately 1400.

Participants: 806

APPLAUD: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of LAU-7b in the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis in Adults

CompletedPhase 2Fenretinide

An International Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAU-7b administered once-daily for 6 months for the treatment of CF.

Participants: 166

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Compare Cessation Versus Continuation of Long-term Mepolizumab Treatment in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma (201810)

CompletedPhase 3

Primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who have received long-term treatment with mepolizumab (at least 3 years) need to maintain treatment with mepolizumab to continue to receive benefit. Subjects who participated in the open-label studies MEA115666 or 201312 with at least 6 months of treatment with mepolizumab prior to Visit 1 and who have no more than 2 consecutive missed doses of mepolizumab treatment will be eligible to participate in this study. This study will be conducted in 4 parts in approximately 300 subjects. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (for subjects with less than 3 years of mepolizumab treatment). Once the required 3 year exposure is reached, subjects will enter Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 weeks to 8 weeks). During Part A and B subjects will be administered Open-label mepolizumab (100 milligram \[mg\] Subcutaneous \[SC\]) every 4 weeks. Part C will be the randomized double-blinded part. Upon completion of Part B, eligible subjects will be randomized to mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks or placebo administered SC every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Subjects discontinuing investigational product (IP) due to a clinically significant asthma exacerbation will then enter optional Part D of the study. During Part D, subjects receive open-label mepolizumab in addition to their standard of care therapy for the remainder of the study, through Part D up to 52-weeks post-randomization. An Exit Visit will be conducted 52 weeks after randomization in order to assess subject's efficacy parameters, immunogenicity status, and to conduct additional safety assessments. Eligible subjects will participate in the study ranging from 56 to192 weeks, depending on the duration of Part A (0 to 132 weeks) and Part B (4 to 8 weeks).

Participants: 306

Frequently Asked Questions

What services does Dr Peter A. Wark offer?
Dr Wark provides a range of lung and breathing care, including asthma, COPD, pneumonia, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and related conditions. He also offers evaluations and treatment for conditions like eosinophilic disorders, hypersensitivity lung disease and lung infections.
Which conditions does he commonly treat?
He treats asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, aspergillosis and other lung conditions. He also cares for patients with acute and chronic respiratory illnesses and complex eosinophilic lung disorders.
Where is Dr Wark’s practice located?
His practice is in New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia.
Can I get a consultation for lung transplant or advanced lung diseases?
Yes. Dr Wark has experience with complex lung conditions and related care. For details about suitability and referrals, please contact the clinic to discuss your situation.
How do I book an appointment with Dr Wark?
To arrange an appointment, please contact the Newcastle clinic. They can provide available times and confirm booking details directly with you.
What should I bring to my first visit?
Bring any medical records related to your lung health, current medications, imaging results (like X‑rays or CT scans) and prior test results if available. If you have questions about tests or treatments, you can ask during the appointment.

Contact Information

New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia

Is this your profile?

Claim this profile →

Memberships

  • Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (FRACP)
  • Fellow of the Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand (FThorSoc)
  • National Asthma Council of Australia
  • Cystic Fibrosis Australia
  • Lung Foundation Australia
  • European Respiratory Society