Daniel C. Chambers

Daniel C. Chambers

MBBS; MD; FRACP; MRCP

Pulmonologist

Over 32 years of Experience (18+ years in his current role)

Male📍 Brisbane

About of Daniel C. Chambers

Daniel C. Chambers is a pulmonologist in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. He works with people who have breathing problems and long-term lung conditions, as well as patients who need help after a sudden flare-up or infection.


In day to day practice, he looks after issues like chronic cough, COPD and emphysema, pneumonia, and other lung infections. He also focuses on more complex problems such as interstitial lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis. Over time, many of these conditions can make it hard to breathe, and they often need careful follow-up to find the right plan.


Daniel also supports patients with conditions linked to the lungs that can be ongoing, like sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. At times, he helps manage people with pulmonary hypertension and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). Some cases involve challenging patterns of scarring or inflammation, so the approach is usually practical and step by step.


He has more than 32 years of experience, with 18+ years in his current role. That kind of time matters with lung care, because symptoms can change, and treatment needs to match what’s happening right now, not just what happened months ago.


Daniel’s medical background includes MBBS, MD, FRACP and MRCP. He completed his MBBS with First Class Honours and a University Medal at the University of Queensland, and later earned his MD through the University of Birmingham in the UK. He is also a Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and a Member of the Royal College of Physicians (UK).


He stays involved with clinical research and has published work over the years. When appropriate, he may also be involved with clinical trials, which can be an option for some patients who meet specific criteria.


If you’re dealing with breathlessness, ongoing cough, or a lung condition that needs specialist input, Daniel’s care is based on listening, checking the details, and working out the next sensible step. The goal is to keep things clear and grounded, while aiming for the best possible outcome for each person.

Education

  • MBBS (with First Class Honours & University Medal); University of Queensland, Australia; 1993
  • MD - Doctor of Medicine; University of Birmingham, UK
  • FRACP — Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  • MRCP (UK) — Member of the Royal College of Physicians (UK)

Services & Conditions Treated

Bronchiolitis ObliteransLung TransplantAcute Interstitial PneumoniaBronchitisHeart TransplantIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInterstitial Lung DiseasePulmonary FibrosisSilicosisEmphysemaActinic KeratosisAlpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)Basal Cell Skin CancerBronchopulmonary DysplasiaCerebral HypoxiaChronic CoughChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Cystic FibrosisCytomegalic Inclusion DiseaseCytomegalovirus InfectionEmpyemaEndoscopyGraft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)Hypersensitivity PneumonitisHypertensionMediastinitisPericarditisPneumoniaPulmonary Alveolar ProteinosisPulmonary HypertensionRheumatoid Lung DiseaseSarcoidosisSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)Squamous Cell Skin CarcinomaSubcutaneous EmphysemaSunburn

Publications

5 total
Primary graft dysfunction, dysbiosis, and innate immune activation after lung transplantation.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation • November 21, 2024

Adam Stewart, Daniel Chambers

The lung is unique among commonly transplanted organs in that it is exposed to both the gastrointestinal tract and the external environment, locations which are characterized by heavy colonization with bacterial organisms. How effectively the lung handles this potential threat, in the setting of attempts by well-meaning clinicians to eliminate the immune response which would normally be invoked in defense, is likely to impact on the success or otherwise of the transplant procedure. Indeed, many previous investigators have confirmed strong associations between the isolation of microbes, using microscopy and culture, and lung transplant outcomes.

Transcriptomic Plasticity of Human Alveolar Macrophages Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Following Drug Exposure: Implications for Therapeutic Development.

International Journal Of Molecular Sciences • March 15, 2025

Penny Groves, Levi Hockey, Brendan O'sullivan, Lai-ying Zhang, Zherui Xiong, Quan Nguyen, Maxine Tan, Viviana Lutzky, Rohan Davis, Daniel Chambers, Simon Apte

Alveolar macrophages (AM) must perform three seemingly opposing roles including homeostasis, driving inflammation, and facilitating tissue repair. Whilst there is now consensus (supported by a large body of human single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data) that the cell subsets that perform these tasks can readily be found based on their transcriptome, their ontogeny has remained unclear. Moreover, there is agreement that in all types of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) there is an expanded population of profibrotic AM that may aberrantly drive PF. From a therapeutic viewpoint, there is great appeal in the notion that the transcriptional program in different AM subsets is not fixed but remains plastic and amenable to pharmacological reprogramming. Accordingly, this study addresses this question by performing scRNA-seq on human AM following treatment with drugs or perturbagens including pioglitazone, trametinib, nintedanib, lipopolysaccharide and the natural compound endiandrin A. Each treatment induced a unique global transcriptional change, driving the cells towards distinct subsets, further supported by trajectory analysis, confirming a high level of plasticity. Confirmatory experiments using qPCR demonstrated that single exposure to a compound induced a relatively stable transcriptome, whereas serial exposure to a different compound allowed the cells to be reprogrammed yet again to a different phenotype. These findings add new insight into the biology of AM and support the development of novel therapies to treat PF.

Epstein Barr Virus Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Monitoring in Lung and Bone Marrow Transplant Patients to Predict Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Transplantation Proceedings • November 12, 2024

Chandima Divithotawela, Shawn Lee, Michael Schulz, Daniel Chambers

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) affects up to 10% of lung transplant patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of PTLD and reduction in immunosuppression may be an effective way to prevent future diseases. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of all bone marrow (BMT/HSCT) and lung transplant studies published in English that assessed quantitative peripheral blood EBV PCR monitoring as a predictive measure of future PTLD occurrence. Studies on pre-emptive therapy before the diagnosis of PTLD were excluded. Results: A thousand of hundred sixty-three studies were screened, and 12 were eligible for the final analysis. The two lung transplant studies reported 60% to 80% sensitivity (SN) and 60% to 86% negative predictive value (NPV), but poor specificity (SP) (30%-75%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (30%-67%). HSCT studies also showed good SN (71.4%-100%) and NPV (94%-100%). However, the SP (range, 50%-96%) and PPV (range, 14%-75%) were poor. The included studies used nonstandardized EBV PCR testing methods, which affected the validity of the results and the applicability of the findings to other transplant programs. Most studies were retrospective and included a small number of cases. Conclusions: In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrated the lack of good-quality evidence and poor SP and PPV of EBV PCR monitoring to predict PTLD development in lung transplantation. The use of PCR-guided preemptive therapy for future PTLD prevention is questionable. Further studies with standardized EBV PCR measurements are required.

Lung transplant candidates' quadriceps strength is a modifiable predictor of recovery in exercise capacity after transplantation.

The Journal Of Heart And Lung Transplantation : The Official Publication Of The International Society For Heart Transplantation • August 31, 2024

James Walsh, Norman Morris, Stephanie Yerkovich, Matthew Linnane, Daniel Chambers, Peter Hopkins

Background: Defining a transplant candidate's suitable functional status and potential for rehabilitation is complex. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) criteria are used in candidacy assessment and pre-transplant quadriceps strength may be a predictor of rehabilitation potential. The study aims were to determine if candidates pre-transplant 6MWD and quadriceps strength are independent factors associated with post-transplant 6MWD and, compare the trajectory in 6MWD and quadriceps strength in candidates from initial assessment to waitlisting and from waitlisting to transplanted (or delisted/died). Methods: An observational repeated measures design was used. 6MWD and QS% were recorded at initial assessment, waitlisting, bi-monthly reassessments until transplanted/delisted/died and 2-, 6- 13- 26- and 52-weeks following transplantation. Results: 342 (192 males; mean (±SD) age 51±14 years; 119 COPD, 93 IIP, 72 cystic fibrosis and 58 other) were studied. Recipients had a mean increase in 6MWD of 170±127 m (p<0.001) at 52-weeks post. Weekly 6MWD recovery was greater during the 2- and 6-week period (β 21.73, p<0.001) compared to the 6- to 52-week period (β 1.28, p<0.001). In the 2- to 6-weeks after transplantation, greater pre-transplant 6MWD (p<0.001), stronger pre-transplant QS% (p=0.001), shorter post-operative hospital admission (p<0.001) and cystic fibrosis (vs other) were factors associated with a greater 6MWD. In the 6- to 52-weeks after transplantation, stronger QS% value at corresponding time (p<0.001), younger recipients (p<0.001) and greater 2-week post-transplant 6MWD (p<0.001) were factors associated with a greater 6MWD. Pre-transplant 6MWD decreased by -0.059m (p<0.001) and QS% increased by 0.014% (p<0.001) per day between initial assessment to waitlisting (n=287). Conclusions: Pre-transplant 6MWD and quadriceps strength are independent factors associated with recovery in exercise capacity after lung transplantation. However, candidates had a marked deterioration in 6MWD, but quadriceps strength had improved while being worked up for waitlisting. Quadriceps strength along with 6MWD should be considered when determining a candidate's lung transplant suitability.

Trial protocol for SiroSkin: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topical sirolimus in chemoprevention of facial squamous cell carcinomas in solid organ transplant recipients.

Trials • August 26, 2024

Lea Dousset, Daniel Chambers, Angela Webster, Nicole Isbel, Scott Campbell, Carla Duarte, Louisa Collins, Diona Damian, Anne Tseng, Emma Karlsen, Olga Ilinsky, Susan Brown, Helmut Schaider, H Soyer, Daniel Ospino, Sam Hogarth, Alvin Chong, Victoria Mar, Scott Mckenzie, Douglas Gin, Pablo Fernandez Penas, Johannes Kern, Katja Loewe, Edwige Roy, Alan Herschtal, Kiarash Khosrotehrani

Background: Keratinocyte carcinomas such as basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas are a major burden affecting morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Best treatment includes frequent skin checks for early detection and surgery for high incidence of skin cancers. Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive drug which may reduce the burden of skin cancer but may be poorly tolerated when given orally. Topical sirolimus has been proven effective at reducing the burden of skin cancers in animal models, and its safety has long been established in children with tuberous sclerosis. A recent 12-week phase II trial of topical sirolimus suggested it was safe and effective at reducing the early signs of skin cancer in the absence of major side effects. The aim of the SiroSkin trial is to determine whether topical sirolimus can fill a major gap in current therapies by reducing the onset and number of new skin cancers thus reducing burden of disease and cost-effectiveness. Methods: Protocol for a multi-centred phase III, participant- and clinician assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised trial in SOTRs. A minimum 146 participants randomised 1:1 will be treated with 1% topical sirolimus versus placebo applied to the face on a regular basis for 24 weeks. Participation is 24 months in total-24 weeks of treatment and 18 months of follow-up. Outcomes include the number of keratinocyte carcinomas at 24 weeks of treatment compared to placebo and then at 12 and 24 months after initiation of treatment. Analysis will be as per protocol and intention to treat. Conclusions: The results of this trial will inform management strategies for skin cancers in SOTRs and provide evidence for cost-effectiveness. Background: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05860881. Registered on June 15, 2023, and on anzctr.org.au (registration number NCT05860881).

Clinical Trials

1 total

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Regimens (60 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg) of Weekly Intravenous Alpha1 Proteinase Inhibitor (Human) in Subjects With Pulmonary Emphysema Due to Alpha1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Active_not_recruitingPhase 3Prolastin C

This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of two separate dose regimens of Alpha-1 MP versus placebo for 156 weeks (i.e., 3 years) using computed tomography (CT) of the lungs as the main measure of efficacy. The two Alpha-1 MP doses to be tested are 60 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg administered weekly by IV infusion for 156 weeks. The study consists of an optional pre-screening phase, Screening Phase, a 156-week Treatment Phase, and an End of Study Visit at Week 160.

Participants: 345

Frequently Asked Questions

What services does Dr Daniel C. Chambers offer?
Dr Chambers provides specialist care in lung and chest conditions. He treats diseases and conditions such as COPD, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumonias, emphysema, cystic fibrosis, and related lung issues. He also performs procedures like endoscopy and manages transplant-related care (lung and heart transplants).
What conditions are commonly managed by a pulmonologist like Dr Chambers?
Common conditions include chronic cough, COPD, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and lung transplant care. He also handles rare lung diseases and smoke-related lung problems.
How can I book an appointment with Dr Chambers in Brisbane?
To book an appointment, contact the Brisbane clinic where Dr Chambers sees patients. They can confirm available times and arrange your consultation.
What should I expect at my first consultation with a pulmonologist?
At the first visit, expect a review of your medical history, any lung tests or imaging you’ve had, and a discussion about symptoms and treatment options. The goal is to understand your lung condition and plan ongoing care.
Which lung conditions does Dr Chambers commonly treat?
He treats a range of lung conditions including COPD, interstitial lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumonia, and related respiratory issues.
Do I need referrals or tests before seeing Dr Chambers?
Details about referrals or tests aren’t specified here. Please contact the Brisbane clinic to confirm any referral requirements and what tests may be helpful before your visit.

Contact Information

Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Is this your profile?

Claim this profile →

Memberships

  • FRACP — Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  • MRCP (UK) — Member of the Royal College of Physicians (UK)