John W. Upham

John W. Upham

MBBS (Hons); FRACP; PhD; Post-doctoral fellowship

Pulmonologist

40-year Clinical Career Experience

Male📍 Brisbane

About of John W. Upham

John W. Upham is a Pulmonologist based in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. He looks after people with long-term and short-term breathing problems, especially when the cause is not so simple. If you’ve had ongoing cough, wheeze, or breathing troubles that keep coming back, that’s the kind of situation he spends time on.

His clinical background covers a wide range of lung and chest conditions. Many patients see him for asthma, including eosinophilic asthma, where a certain type of inflammation plays a big role. He also works with people who have COPD, bronchitis, and bronchiectasis, and those dealing with flare-ups and ongoing symptoms. At times, his care extends to complex patterns like chronic eosinophilic pneumonia and related conditions.

Infectious issues are also part of his work. That includes pneumonia and viral infections like RSV. He’s also looked after people with conditions such as atypical pneumonia and Mycoplasma pneumonia. On top of that, he supports patients where there may be allergy-linked breathing symptoms, including grass allergy and allergic rhinitis. Some people are also referred with questions around uncommon breathing-related conditions, including hypereosinophilic syndrome and simple pulmonary eosinophilia.

John’s experience comes from a long clinical career, with around 40 years of hands-on work in respiratory medicine. Over time, that sort of experience helps with the “what’s really going on?” moments. It can also help when tests show more than one issue happening at once, like asthma plus infections, or breathing symptoms linked with other health problems.

His qualifications include an MBBS (Hons) from The University of Queensland (circa 1980), FRACP (Fellow of the Royal Austrasian College of Physicians) in 1989, and a PhD from the University of Western Australia in 1996. He has also completed a post-doctoral fellowship at McMaster University in Canada.

Research and publications have been part of his work as well, with multiple publications listed across his career. Clinical trials are not listed as part of his current profile, but his training and research experience sit in the background of how he approaches diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Practically, patients can expect care that focuses on clear breathing explanations and steady next steps. The goal is to help you get control where possible, manage symptoms when things flare up, and make sure serious causes are not missed.

Education

  • MBBS (Hons) — The University of Queensland, circa 1980
  • FRACP (Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians) — 1989
  • PhD — University of Western Australia, 1996
  • Post-doctoral fellowship — McMaster University, Canada

Services & Conditions Treated

AsthmaBronchitisEosinophilic AsthmaBronchiectasisChronic Eosinophilic PneumoniaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Eosinophilic PneumoniaFluGrass AllergyHypereosinophilic SyndromePulmonary EmbolismSimple Pulmonary EosinophiliaAddison's DiseaseAgranulocytosisAllergic RhinitisAtypical PneumoniaCommon ColdCushing's syndromeCystic FibrosisEndoscopyMesotheliomaMycoplasma PneumoniaObesityParainfluenzaPneumoniaRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection

Publications

5 total
Experiences of Oral Corticosteroid Use and Adverse Effects: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of People with Asthma.

Patient preference and adherence • July 19, 2024

Arwel Jones, Vanessa Mcdonald, Rebecca Mcloughlin, Teresa Vella, Anthony Flynn, John Blakey, Luke Wolfenden, Mark Hew, John Upham, Dennis Thomas, Philip Bardin, Anne Holland

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are an effective treatment for severe uncontrolled asthma or asthma exacerbations, but frequent bursts or long-term use carry serious and sometimes irreversible adverse effects, or complications such as adrenal insufficiency upon discontinuation. Our aim was to survey people with asthma on their experiences of, and attitudes towards, using OCS. This study was a national descriptive cross-sectional survey of people with asthma in Australia. An anonymous survey was hosted online with invitations to participate distributed by national consumer peak bodies. Survey free-text responses were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to elicit determinants of OCS use. 1808 people with asthma participated between 3 and 16 May 2022. Most common reasons for using OCS were severe asthma symptoms (40%), doctor prescription (38%) or asthma action plan recommendations (20%). Approximately 55% of people had experienced adverse effects from OCS use. Commonly reported adverse effects were trouble sleeping (69%), weight gain (56%) and mood problems (41%). Of people who had OCS at home or an OCS script, 44% did not have an action plan that described when and how they should take them. People (33%) did not feel well informed about OCS adverse effects from their healthcare team. People had varied awareness (3-65%) of current available strategies to reduce OCS use. 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' were the most coded TDF domains influencing OCS use. Adverse effects of OCS use are common. People with asthma are not adequately informed about optimal OCS use or strategies to reduce overuse. These findings can help guide the implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.

Impact of biologics initiation on oral corticosteroid use in the International Severe Asthma Registry and the Optimum Patient Care Research Database: a pooled analysis of real-world data.

The Journal Of Allergy And Clinical Immunology. In Practice • December 25, 2024

Wenjia Chen, Trung Tran, John Townend, George Christoff, Ming-ju Tsai, Alan Altraja, Belinda Cochrane, Borja Cosio, Martin Sivori, Ruth Murray, Michael Makris, Ghislaine Scelo, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Ledit R Ardusso, María Franchi, Jorge Máspero, Fernando Saldarini, Ana Stok, Ana Tomaszuk, Anahí Yañez, Benjamin Emmanuel, Cathy Emmas, Konstantinos Kostikas, Andrew Menzies Gow, Neda Stjepanovic, Sinthia Bosnic Anticevich, Eve Denton, Peter Gibson, Mark Hew, Christine Jenkins, Peter Middleton, Matthew Peters, John Upham, Guy Brusselle, Renaud Louis, Florence Schleich, Paulo Pitrez, Todor Popov, Celine Bergeron, Mohit Bhutani, Kenneth Chapman, Andréanne Côté, Simon Couillard, Delbert Dorscheid, M Lougheed, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Carlos Celis Preciado, Libardo Jiménez Maldonado, Bellanid Rodríguez Cáceres, Diana Cano Rosales, Ivan Solarte, Carlos Torres Duque, Susanne Hansen, Celeste Porsbjerg, Charlotte Ulrik, Arnaud Bourdin, Petros Bakakos, Konstantinos Exarchos, Athena Gogali, Aggelos Ladias, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Andriana Papaioannou, Richard Costello, Breda Cushen, Patrick Mitchell, Giorgio Canonica, Enrico Heffler, Francesca Puggioni, Takashi Iwanaga, Tatsuya Nagano, Yuji Tohda, Mona Al Ahmad, Désirée Linnemann, Bernt Aarli, Sverre Lehmann, Piotr Kuna, José Ferreira, João Fonseca, Cláudia Loureiro, Riyad Al Lehebi, Adeeb Bulkhi, Yah Juang, Mariko Koh, Anqi Liu, Chin Rhee, Luis Perez De Llano, Pin-kuei Fu, Diahn-warng Perng, Chau-chyun Sheu, Hao-chien Wang, Bassam Mahboub, Laila Salameh, John Busby, Liam Heaney, David Jackson, Pujan Patel, Paul Pfeffer, Flavia Hoyte, Rohit Katial, Njira Lugogo, Roy Pleasants, Eileen Wang, Michael Wechsler, Aaron Beastall, Victoria Carter, Nevaashni Eleangovan, Kirsty Fletton, David Price

Background: For severe asthma (SA) management, real-world evidence on the effects of biologic therapies in reducing the burden of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use is limited. Objective: To estimate the efficacy of biologic initiation on total OCS (TOCS) exposure in SA patients from real-world specialist and primary care settings. Methods: From the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR, specialist care) and the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD, primary care, UK), adult biologic initiators were identified and propensity score-matched with non-initiators (ISAR, 1:1; OPCRD, 1:2). The impact of biologic initiation on TOCS (including bursts for exacerbations) daily dose in the first and second year follow-up period was estimated using multivariable generalized linear models. Results: Among 5663 patients (ISAR 48%, OPCRD 52%), the odds ratios (ORs) of biologic initiators achieving TOCS cessation in the first and second year of follow-up were 2.38 (95% CI, 1.87-3.04) and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.65-2.70), whereas the ORs of low (0-5mg) TOCS intake were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.40-1.86) and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.21-1.61) respectively. Compared to non-initiators, biologic initiators had a substantially higher chance of achieving >75% reduction from baseline (OR [95% CI]: 2.35 [2.06-2.68] and 1.53 [1.35-1.73] in first and second year, respectively). These findings remained persistent and robust, when analyses were repeated with one country setting removed at a time. Conclusions: Biologic initiation in SA patients led to substantial reduction in TOCS exposure, in particular in the first year. Future analyses will explore the impact on OCS-related adverse health events.

Biomarker profile and disease burden associated with intermittent and long-term oral corticosteroid use in patients with severe asthma prior to biologic initiation in real-life (STAR).

The World Allergy Organization Journal • December 18, 2024

Florence Schleich, Désirée Larenas Linnemann, Alan Altraja, Luis Pérez De Llano, Konstantinos Kostikas, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Arnaud Bourdin, Roy Alton Pleasants, Mark Hew, Wenjia Chen, Libardo Jiménez Maldonado, Simon Couillard, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Adeeb Bulkhi, Ming-ju Tsai, George Christoff, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Paul Pfeffer, Dermot Ryan, Celine Bergeron, Mona Al Ahmad, Delbert Dorscheid, Eileen Wang, John Blakey, Belinda Cochrane, Matthew Peters, Todor Popov, Carlos Torres Duque, Susanne Hansen, Francesca Puggioni, Kirsty Fletton, Laila Salameh, Peter Middleton, Paulo Márcio Pitrez, Chin Kook Rhee, Eve Denton, Kenneth Chapman, Lauri Lehtimäki, Ruth Murray, Chau-chyun Sheu, David Jackson, Riyad Al Lehebi, Mariko Siyue Koh, Bassam Mahboub, Ledit R Ardusso, Athena Gogali, Giorgio Canonica, Piotr Kuna, Martin Sivori, Renaud Louis, Shelley Abercromby, Giuseppe Guida, Bernt Aarli, Aaron Beastall, Victoria Carter, Ghislaine Scelo, John Townend, Borja Cosio, Pujan Patel, Celine Yun Goh, Zsuzsanna Csoma, John Upham, João Fonseca, Peter Gibson, Christine Jenkins, Guy Brusselle, Anne Chèvremont, Andréanne Côté, Carlos Celis Preciado, Ivan Solarte, Celeste Porsbjerg, Asger Sverrild, Paula Kauppi, Stelios Loukides, Michael Makris, Andriana Papaioannou, Enrico Heffler, Jeffrey Shi Chan, Hyonsoo Joo, Liam Heaney, Wei-han Cheng, Njira Lugogo, Michael Wechsler, Cláudia Chaves Loureiro, Bellanid Rodríguez Cáceres, Tatsuya Nagano, Zhixiao Wang, Hao-chien Wang, Jorge Máspero, Fernando Saldarini, Ana Stok, Anahi Yañez, Philip Bardin, Sinthia Bosnic Anticevich, Vidya Navaratnam, Mohit Bhutani, M Lougheed, Lyle Melenka, Petros Bakakos, Konstantinos Exarchos, Aggelos Ladias, Dóra Lúdvíksdóttir, Takashi Iwanaga, Elvia Contreras, Sverre Lehmann, José Ferreira, Rebecca Gall, Pin-kuei Fu, Diahn-warng Perng, Flavia Hoyte, Rohit Katial, Unnur Björnsdóttir, Camille Taillé, Christian Taube, Breda Cushen, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Leif Bjermer, David Price

Asthma characterization using blood eosinophil count (BEC) (among other biomarkers and clinical indices) is recommended in severe asthma (SA), but the masking effect of oral corticosteroids (OCS), makes this challenging. Our aim was to explore the effect of OCS use (both intermittent [iOCS] and long-term [LTOCS]) prior to biologic initiation on SA phenotype and biomarker profile in real-life and to characterize the burden of SA among patients prescribed LTOCS by biomarker profile. This was a registry-based cohort study, including data from 23 countries collected between 2003 and 2023 and shared with the Internatonal Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR). Patients with SA were categorized into 3 cohorts, those with: (i) no prescription for OCS, (ii) prescription(s) for iOCS (ie, ≤90 days in previous 12-months, usually short courses for exacerbations), and (iii) prescriptions for LTOCS (ie, >90 days in previous 12-months). Biomarker distribution (ie, BEC, fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO], and total Immunoglobulin E [IgE]) were quantified in the year prior to biologic initiation in patients with SA according to OCS prescription pattern. Phenotypes were characterized for those prescribed LTOCS according to BEC cut-off (<150 and ≥ 150 cells/μL). Of 4305 patients included, 5.0% (n = 215), 54.1% (n = 2330) and 40.9% (n = 1760) were prescribed no OCS, iOCS, and LTOCS, respectively. The BEC distribution varied by prescription pattern and LTOCS dose (<5 mg to ≥20 mg/day); BEC was <150 cells/μL in 28.6% (n = 369/1288) of LTOCS patients, compared to 19.5% (n = 284/1460) of iOCS patients and 14.0% (n = 21/150) of those in the no OCS group. Median BEC was also significantly lower in the LTOCS versus the iOCS group (310 vs 400 cells/μL; p < 0.001). A similar pattern was noted for IgE, but not FeNO. Among LTOCS patients with BEC <150 cells/μL, 39.9% experienced ≥4 exacerbations, 75.1% had uncontrolled asthma symptoms and 55.9% had evidence of persistent airflow obstruction (compared with 40.9%, 76.2% and 59.5% of those with BEC ≥150 cells/μL, respectively). OCS, whether prescribed intermittently or long term, affect BEC distribution potentially leading to heightened risk of phenotype misclassification and influencing subsequent treatment decisions. FeNO appears to be less susceptible to OCS-induced suppression. Disease burden was high for those in the LTOCS group and was high independent of dose and BEC. Our findings highlight the importance of considering OCS use, even intermittent use, when characterizing SA, and suggests the need for earlier phenotyping and alternative treatment strategies for LTOCS patients with low BEC.

Unlocking Asthma Remission: Key Insights From an Expert Roundtable Discussion.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) • December 11, 2024

Dennis Thomas, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter Gibson, Eleanor Majellano, Vanessa Clark, Michael Fricker, Yuto Hamada, Gary Anderson, Vibeke Backer, Philip Bardin, Richard Beasley, Jimmy Chien, Claude Farah, John Harrington, Erin Harvey, Mark Hew, Anne Holland, Christine Jenkins, Constance Katelaris, Gregory Katsoulotos, Kirsty Murray, Matthew Peters, Rejoy Thomas, Katrina Tonga, John Upham, Peter Wark, Vanessa Mcdonald

Treatment targets in severe asthma have evolved towards a remission-focused paradigm guided by precision medicine. This novel concept requires a shift from evaluating the efficacy of therapies based on a single outcome at a single time point to an outcome that captures the complexity of asthma remission involving several domains assessed over a sustained period. Since the concept is still emerging, multiple definitions have been proposed, ranging from symptom control and exacerbation-free to resolution of underlying pathobiology, with varying rigour in each parameter. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current construct is needed to progress further. We conducted a roundtable discussion with 27 asthma experts to address this issue, and discussions were narratively synthesised and summarised. The participants observed that between one in three and one in five people treated with targeted biological therapies or macrolides experience low disease activity over a sustained period. They unanimously agreed that labelling the attained clinical state as clinical remission is useful as a clinical (e.g., facilitating a treat-to-target approach), policy (e.g., widening eligibility criteria for biologics), and scientific (e.g., a path to understanding cure) tool. Current remission rates vary significantly due to definition variability. When assessing remission, it is essential to consider confounding factors (e.g., steroid use for adrenal insufficiency). More research is required to reach an acceptable definition, and including the patient's voice in such research is essential. In conclusion, the concept of treatment-induced clinical remission is possible and valuable in asthma. However, further refinement of the definition is required.

Association between hospitalised childhood pneumonia and follow-up chest radiographs in high-risk populations: a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Archives Of Disease In Childhood • October 08, 2024

Hing Kok, Stephanie Yerkovich, Gabrielle Mccallum, Keith Grimwood, Ian Masters, Nicholas Fancourt, Siew Fong, Anna Nathan, Catherine Byrnes, Robert Ware, Nachal Nachiappan, Noorazlina Saari, Peter Morris, Tsin Yeo, Victor Oguoma, Jessie De Bruyne, Kah Eg, Bilawara Lee, Mong Ooi, John Upham, Paul Torzillo, Anne Chang

Objective: As children hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are at risk of persistent chest radiograph (CXR) abnormalities and respiratory sequelae, we investigated factors associated with incomplete CXR resolution at 4 weeks and 12 months post-discharge in children from populations at high-risk of chronic lung disease. Methods: Secondary analysis-multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial. Methods: 324 children aged 3 months to ≤5 years hospitalised with radiographic-confirmed CAP were enrolled from seven hospitals in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia. After 1-3 days of intravenous antibiotics, then 3 days of oral amoxicillin-clavulanate, they were randomised to extended (13-14 days) or standard (5-6 days) courses of antibiotics. Methods: CXRs were performed at admission, 4 weeks, and 12 months post-discharge and reviewed in a blinded manner. Methods: Radiographic changes of pneumonia at 4 weeks and 12 months post-discharge compared with admission CXRs. Results: Among children with interpretable CXRs, incomplete resolution was seen in 42/253 (17%) at 4 weeks, and 29/212 (14%) at 12 months. Characteristics at admission associated with incomplete CXR resolution at 4 weeks were previous pneumonia hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj])=6.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21 to 18.85) and increasing age (ORadj=0.60 per-year, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94). Continuing respiratory symptoms/signs at 4 weeks post-discharge was also associated with incomplete resolution (OR=5.63, 95% CI 2.38 to 13.32). At 12 months, previous pneumonia hospitalisation was associated with persistent incomplete CXR resolution (OR=4.03, 95 % CI 1.25 to 13.02). Conclusions: In high-risk settings, younger age, those with previous pneumonia hospitalisation, or ongoing respiratory symptoms/signs 4 weeks post-discharge from hospitalised CAP may be associated with incomplete CXR resolution. Consequently, follow-up imaging and monitoring may be warranted in these children.

Frequently Asked Questions

What services does Dr John W. Upham offer?
Dr Upham offers a wide range of pulmonary and related services, including asthma management, bronchitis care, eosinophilic and chronic eosinophilic conditions, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia and atypical pneumonia care, respiratory infections such as flu and RSV, allergic conditions like grass allergy and allergic rhinitis, and related procedures such as endoscopy.
Which conditions does he commonly treat?
He treats conditions affecting the lungs and airways, such as asthma, bronchitis, eosinophilic disorders (including eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic pneumonia), COPD, pneumonia, mesothelioma, bronchiectasis, and related allergic or infectious conditions.
Where is Dr Upham based and available for appointments?
Dr Upham practices in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. If you’re seeking an appointment, you’d check with his Brisbane-based practice for availability.
What is Dr Upham’s professional background?
He has an MBBS with honours, FRACP, a PhD, and a post-doctoral fellowship. He has about 40 years of clinical experience as a pulmonologist.
What kinds of tests or procedures might be part of the care?
Given his field and listed services, care may involve assessments related to lung function and respiratory conditions, and possible endoscopy as part of evaluation.
How long has Dr Upham been practicing?
He has a 40-year clinical career in pulmonology.

Contact Information

Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Is this your profile?

Claim this profile →

Memberships

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
  • Fellow of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand
  • President of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand